Saturday, July 25, 2015

Racism Lives Forever. #HulkHogan


The Immortal Racism.

I already know that despite the intent of this article, I'm sure to get attacked.  That's fine.  I've got a thick skin.  I've learned to "Rise Above Hate", or at least, ignore it.

Quick back note: I've experienced both closet racism and blatant racism.  Closet in the sense that I've worked at jobs where clearly, those around me thought less of me because of my skin tone (since the quality of my work often exceeded others), blatant in that the friend I knew the longest (who was white) once called me "The N Word" right in front of a group of others simply because he was angry about a girl he liked that was attracted to me.  A white girl.  So yes, I know a bit about racism.

Racism isn't just about physical harm.  It's a thought process; an illogical one.  You simply think less of a person who isn't of your same race.  You might not even hate them as a person; you just don't think much of them compared to yourself.

Much has been made of  the recent news regarding Hulk Hogan, and I want to clarify points, because I'm seeing really disturbing responses.  Most everyone knows the name "Hulk Hogan", whether it's because you saw him as a wrestler or you saw him in movies.  At a point, his character transcended anything: the will to survive insurmountable odds, the physical strength to overcome what normal men couldn't.

Now, he's associated with something that people thought Hillbilly Jim would be better suited for.

The interview where he went on a rant IS NOT the talk show where he talked about how he just got used to saying "nigga" with his "black friends".

You see, some years ago, Hulk Hogan was BFF's with Bubba "The Love Sponge", a radio shock jock.  For some stupid reason, Sponge literally pimped his (ex) wife out to Hogan and video taped not only the performance, but their conversation while he was in an adjacent room.  When the news broke, there was Safe-For-Work snippets released of this performance, but very little.  The situation went to court and a deposition was taken, because there was no consent to release the footage.


Now, it is apparently during this video that Hogan made these comments.  There may have been a confidentiality agreement in place, which is why we hadn't heard about this before and why Hogan's now-lawyer is saying they're going to go after whoever leaked the footage.  It was never meant to be heard by the public and in fact, it's surprising that WWE even hired Hogan back (he wasn't working there when the footage was released) given they stated they had a policy that they wouldn't hire anyone with a sex tape.

The catch: Gawker is who originally broke the story, and was later silenced by a judge (but refused).  They posted the footage on their website, but then got sued and had to take it down per court order.

Fast forward to 2015.  Early in the morning, Twitter lights up with news that WWE.com has apparently begun scrubbing Hulk Hogan.  No known reason why at this point - though his recent matches and interactions appear to still be available (he's in or referenced in at least half of WWE's history, I would imagine!)


Later, it's discovered that a transcript has been leaked.  The transcript is from the full deposition from the sex tape fiasco, and apparently, WWE officials (probably, Vince himself) has watched the video and determined that it was clear Terry Bollea (Hulk Hogan's real name) was a racist, and not appropriate for PG WWE.  Somewhere, an instruction was sent to distance from Bollea, and a page written indicating that he was terminated.

For many hours Hogan trended as people made fun of the situation, but it is here that I saw the disturbing replies.  I won't repeat what was said and I won't link to the transcript, because I don't want people excusing bad behavior.  But let me get on to my points now that you understand the real genesis of this story.

People have to learn and understand that they can't just say whatever about people.  Stop and process what you're thinking of saying and make sure it's not about to offend people or get you arrested; or, if you believe you have every right to share it, then accept and own the negatives of that decision.

A not-so-wise character once said, "choice is an illusion".  I don't agree.  Choice is all we have.  You make choices all the time; some good, some bad.  But when you can control the situation, you maintain power over it even when you are in the wrong.  In this situation, Hogan was being filmed, presumably didn't know, but the problem is he was talking to someone and saying things that could harm his reputation.  Again, this is a guy who was at the forefront of what it meant to appeal to children: say your prayers, eat your vitamins, etc.  He was a figurehead.  He had to always act that way, even if he didn't believe it (I'll get to THAT later).  

Hogan had a choice of words.  He could have said, "I feel like all I've done to benefit my daughter, she hasn't appreciated, because she's turning to other resources that I don't agree with".  Instead, he went on a total tirade and denigrated an entire race of people, and it all centered (presumably) around his disagreement with his daughter's choice of boyfriend.  That's bad.  It's not what you say, it's how you say it.

Now, flip this.  Benedict Cumberbatch gave an article where he referred to "coloured people".  In context, he was referring to fellow actors of color, but because of his heritage he said the first thing to come to mind, and he didn't expect any sort of backlash because he wasn't referring to them negatively; he was actually talking about them not getting fair opportunities compared to white actors.  But he got literally roasted for that slip and apologized for his ignorance.  He didn't know that it was a sensitive thing, and realistically, he shouldn't have been attacked; unfortunately, he needed to assume that certain words or terms would be taken wrong in context.

That's the unfortunate state of society today.  You can't just say what you want.  People will jump down your throat for it.

It's not about "free time" or "personal time".

I saw this excuse quite a few times.  That he wasn't on the clock, it was his "free time", and he was having a "private conversation" on his "personal time".  I'm thinking to myself, why don't these people get it?  Are people seriously that blind?

It has NOTHING to do with free time, personal time, private time, private space, etc.  Nothing.  If you're sitting in a room by yourself with nobody in earshot, you're more than welcome to rant all day long about whatever you want.  It doesn't matter, because nobody's there.  If you're in a situation where someone could hear what you're saying and you're not sure they share your same sentiments, you're putting yourself at risk of backlash - possibly legal backlash - and a nightmare situation.  

Especially when you're someone like Hogan who is at the forefront of a marketing giant.  Why he would basically talk to a hooker about his racial bias I have no idea.  The whole situation started because he ranted off at the mouth very disturbing things about another race on video.  No, he didn't know about the video - but that's EXACTLY why he shouldn't have said the things in that situation!  Even if there weren't video, the hooker could have just blackmailed him, set her phone to record in her purse and used it to extort him.

Like another wise person said, "D.T.A. - Don't Trust Anybody".  Yes that's sad.  But it's the only way to protect oneself. 

If you're a flat out open racist and you don't care who hears your rant, that's one thing, but Hogan now says he's "not that type".  On the transcript, he said he was.  Now he looks like a liar and a hypocrite.

Excuses for the racism just allow it to fester and continue, rather than die off.

In addition to the above excuses, I see people saying "I know he's a good person", "not a racist bone in his body", "he deserves to be forgiven", "it was a mistake", "what's the big deal", "but WWE does it too tho", etc.  These are all excuses.

The only way we can move past it - TRULY move past it - is to confront it head on.

Hogan admitted saying the terms.  He apologized.  But then he made a mistake saying, "I'm not that person".  Uh, yes, you are: you SAID you were.  You can't do both.

What he should have said is this (or something like it).

"This is Terry Bollea.  You know me as Hulk Hogan.  For years I've entertained you in many ways, but recently things have come to light that have tarnished that history.  

In a private communication I said some very hateful, bigoted things about African Americans because I was frustrated about a family situation involving them.  I want to be clear: I did it, and it was wrong.  Period.  There's no excuse for what I said or why.

I'll be honest.  It's the way I think, it's the way I was raised.  I can't help that.  But I can try to learn, try to improve and understand why it's wrong.  I can say I have never directly said or done anything inappropriate to someone of the opposite race.  Some point to an incident with my restaurant which I agree was in poor taste and might have been subconsciously related to the way I think.  But I acted to remove it because it was inappropriate.

I have more respect for why the way I think just doesn't work.  I have more respect for why it's stupid to put down another race for any reason.  I've got some work to do to fix what's been done.  For now, I accept the punishment.  But I'll keep on pressing forward until I get to a point that I can view all men equally, and truly "fight for the rights of every man"."

In the above, as Paul Heyman says, he does everything to capture the audience.  He makes a clear distinction between the man and the character, first and foremost (I'll do another article on that later).  He accepts responsibility and owns it.  He doesn't say "that's not me!" he OWNS it.  He explains it.  Then talks about what he's doing to fix it.

That's how respect is gained.  He'd still be attacked by those who let their emotions guide their actions, but the majority of people will respect him and dare I say, forgive him for something that, while not just a simple mistake, was something done and in the past.

People making excuses for Hogan are just making the problem worse.  Racists, even closet racists, have to own up to the way they think and feel and accept it.  Then, work to fix it.  If they deny it or pass it off as "a mistake", they're not really getting rid of the disease.

That WWE, WWF, TNA, etc. have had racially charged storylines is not a free pass for Hogan.  That they have had racism behind the scenes is not a free pass for Hogan.

This is another issue.  People can't separate a storyline from a real-life racism situation.

Pro wrestling has had its fair share of racially charged storylines.  The intent is to get people interested with some realistic in-the-media situations.  But it's not just wrestling, regular TV does it too.  Law and Order had plenty of racially charged stories.  Night Court had racially charged stories.  Even people's favorite "Star Trek" had tons of racially charged stories.  They're STORIES.  They're told to attach to the reality and as part of The Arts, are used to tell the story forward.  They shouldn't be used as an excuse for real racism.

This does not say that Michael Hayes throwing a racial slur at Mark Henry should be overlooked and forgiven.  He got punished for it, but the thing is, it wasn't on air. It wasn't recorded.  It wasn't in a deposition.  It wasn't exposed to general audience.  And no, it's not the same thing as the Del Rio situation where Del Rio physically attacked someone in response to a racial slur.  Said person was fired from WWE eventually.  Plenty of African American stars of the past have talked about racism - Mark Henry included - but they didn't physically assault someone.  

But more importantly, Michael Hayes isn't an icon.  Most wouldn't even know who he is if he were walking down the street.  He's not in front of a marketing machine selling merchandise like Hogan.  He's not on national TV with sponsors selling products.  There's a whole different ball game with Hogan doing it.  You'd see the same exact outcome if Cena were to come out (outside of the WWE) ragging on Asians or something.

Shots of Michael Hayes' old gimmick where he'd paint the Confederate Flag on his face, or Roddy Piper painting blackface, or JBL doing the Hitler march in Germany...all stories designed to get a reaction.  (Devil's Advocate: I do believe that Roddy Piper simply hates fans.  I don't think he cares what their race is.  But I digress.)


Racism will live on no matter what, because people are quick to excuse it, but they'll deny it when presented it.

Monday, January 26, 2015

Deja Vu: The #WWE #RoyalRumble Debacle


Clearly, someone at Stamford has read - and re-read - Eric Bischoff's book, "Controversy Creates Cash".  It's the only logical explanation for what most of the WWE Universe witnessed with the Royal Rumble on January 25th.   To understand what I mean, we need to go back in time a bit.


Tuesday, January 6, 2015

The #WWE Universe Gets a #RAW Deal


First, a disclaimer.  For those that didn't know, I have been boycotting RAW for the longest time.  In fact, I've been boycotting so long that I forgot when I actually started.  But I remember the reason: at the time, WWE was consistently putting certain stars over others where the others were not given the opportunity to shine.  John Cena was at the top of this list, where I saw him consistently put over stars like Bray Wyatt.  I do also remember that Damien Sandow was still a standalone star - one who got added unceremoniously to history as the only person to truly lose the Money in the Bank cash-in match.  Against John Cena.  It all came back to Cena, and the reason for my boycott was that Cena needed to speak up and do the right thing.


Thursday, August 7, 2014

Why The #WWENetwork Was Doomed To Fail In The US


$9.99 a month seems like a dream price for access to the WWE's entire wrestling library, right?  I mean DAYS worth of content from the territories, from WCW, ECW, and the various eras.  Pay-Per-View no longer an overpriced nicety but a cost effective avenue to get your fix.  Yet, WWE failed to even scratch the surface of American viewership.  Why?  It's easy...the price doesn't make sense.


Tuesday, August 5, 2014

#WWE Doesn't Understand How To Rehash Storylines Properly.



 I really don't know what's going through the minds over in Connecticut.  It's like they want to rehash stories from old times but just don't do it right for some reason.  I don't get why they do things this way.

On RAW, The Authority vs. Bella storyline was advanced in anticipation of the rather doomed match between Stephanie and Brie Bella at SummerSlam.  While I'm never a fan of having a PPV match between two Divas who arguably aren't that good in the ring, it's at least putting Divas in the front and center of attention again.  There will be two Diva matches, which we haven't seen in many years if my memory serves me.

My problem hinges around the storyline itself.  I get what they're doing at a basic level, I just don't know why, because they're missing a much larger payoff - and possibly more satisfied long term fans.  The key?  John Cena.


Saturday, March 1, 2014

Kayfabe Conspiracy: Is Nikki Bella Sister Abigail...?

Recently, John Cena experienced an injury during an attack by the Wyatt Family.  The commentators positioned that Cena's knee was hyperextended, later a photo was shared that seemed to show Cena's knee cap being completely dislocated, apparently validating the knee injury.  However, Cena would later go on to claim it was a groin injury.

For those that don't remember the song, the knee bone is NOT connected to the groin muscle.  At least, not unless you're African American.  But I digress.

A groin injury can happen a number of ways: muscle gets pulled inappropriately, strain during workouts, etc.  But we don't know it's a valid injury; let's go with it for now.  So assuming it's a groin pull, sex is yet another way it can happen.  Given the feud with the Wyatts, is it possible...remotely...that the writers might end up positioning Nikki as Sister Abigail?


Monday, November 4, 2013

WWE's Missed Opportunities

I'm starting to notice a pattern with WWE.  It's a pattern I've seen before: tons of talent, not used in an obvious or logical way.

I just got done watching RAW.  Alberto Del Rio was on commentary with Zeb Colter during what was arguably the best match of the night, a three-way tag match with Cena and the Rhodes Brothers vs. Damien Sandow and the Real Americans.  Never mind for the moment the fact that Cena is not main eventing the night.  Never mind the fact that the Real Americans are losing matches.  The tag team scene in WWE is at its hottest, and now is the time for them to strike and get some good bids out of it.

What we have here...are factions.





The Real Americans are a tag team of two guys that WWE had nothing better for.  And honestly, Swagger is floundering in the team.  Cesaro is the real star.  But it's helped both guys get TV time they might not have otherwise.  I say that's best for business, certainly.  But what about all of the other great talent WWE has waiting in the wings, either constantly in the gym or hanging out around the catering table?  There is an opportunity to do the same with a lot of them.  I'm not suggesting they make every jobber pair a tag team, but there are some that are natural fits where there could be something done.  For the others, the division simply needs to be refined, and Smackdown is the key to that.

Let's start with factions.  "The Authority" is a faction.  "Paul Heyman Guys" is a pseudo-faction (although there are only two guys in it at present, one of which isn't a full-time employee).  If played right, Alberto Del Rio could easily create a faction of his own.  I have no idea what to call it.  But look at where he is now: He's calling everyone "gringos", which is a slang way of describing white people - if you were a black man and called someone a "cracker", same basic premise.  People have wanted Del Rio to get back to his flashy cars and amazing entrance, and WWE, either due to disinterest or budget restriction, won't do it.  But what if Del Rio were to "hire" Hunico and Camacho as his heavies?  Straight cholo thugs that do his bidding, guard him, etc?  It seems WWE wants Ricardo to turn face, which is unfortunate since his destiny seems to be to announce Del Rio on the way to the ring.  He would be a perfect compliment to this new Scarface-ish faction especially if they do skits and promos outside of the ring, like showing Del Rio counting money at his mansion or something.

Then there's the straight tag teams.  Many may not recall that Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder are former Tag Team Champions as The Edgeheads.  Neither is doing anything as separate competitors; teaming them back up would make perfect sense given the current state of tag teams in WWE.  You've also got Justin Gabriel who quite frankly was at his best as Justin Angel in FCW, but barring that, he really should be a tag team with Heath Slater as they were in Corre.  Done right the WWE could really have something with Hawkins/Ryder, The Corre, and Los Matadores.  Right there you've got 6 of the best talent on the roster.  Throw The Rhodes Brothers in the mix, and WWE may end up making more legends than they know what to do with.

That leaves the singles guys.  The Cruiserweight belt definitely needs to be brought back, period.  Guys like Sin Cara, Tyson Kidd, Kofi Kingston, Justin Gabriel, Epico, Hunico, Primo, Cody, and soon to be Tyler Breeze could easily steal the show nightly by being allowed to showcase the moves that make the division shine.

Treat this as a mini-rant if you will.  But I really hope WWE starts to really push the envelope somewhat.  Have Smackdown be the show that has all of the exciting action.  Have RAW be the show that tells the stories.  Have NXT be the show where mat-based wrestling matters.  Keep the three independent, cross over only when it makes sense.